![SQL SERVER - MySQL - LIMIT and OFFSET - Skip and Return Only Next Few Rows - Paging Solution - SQL Authority with Pinal Dave SQL SERVER - MySQL - LIMIT and OFFSET - Skip and Return Only Next Few Rows - Paging Solution - SQL Authority with Pinal Dave](https://blog.sqlauthority.com/i/b/sspaging2.jpg)
SQL SERVER - MySQL - LIMIT and OFFSET - Skip and Return Only Next Few Rows - Paging Solution - SQL Authority with Pinal Dave
![Sql Server : Retrieve the next 'n' records after 'm' using OFFSET & FETCH. | Playing with database servers... Sql Server : Retrieve the next 'n' records after 'm' using OFFSET & FETCH. | Playing with database servers...](https://sqltimes.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/using_offset_fetch.png)
Sql Server : Retrieve the next 'n' records after 'm' using OFFSET & FETCH. | Playing with database servers...
![SQL Paging in SQL Server 2012 using SQL ORDER BY OFFSET and FETCH NEXT | Sql server, Sql, Microsoft sql server SQL Paging in SQL Server 2012 using SQL ORDER BY OFFSET and FETCH NEXT | Sql server, Sql, Microsoft sql server](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/60/3a/42/603a424ce69368a6c728a96a4333b15e.png)
SQL Paging in SQL Server 2012 using SQL ORDER BY OFFSET and FETCH NEXT | Sql server, Sql, Microsoft sql server
![Sql server 2012 fetch vs old row_number performance. What am I missing? Why is row_number 17x faster? - Stack Overflow Sql server 2012 fetch vs old row_number performance. What am I missing? Why is row_number 17x faster? - Stack Overflow](https://i.stack.imgur.com/ahpUB.jpg)
Sql server 2012 fetch vs old row_number performance. What am I missing? Why is row_number 17x faster? - Stack Overflow
![Performance issue using new paging stynax in SQL Server 2012 (OFFSET n ROWS FETCH NEXT m ROWS ONLY) - Stack Overflow Performance issue using new paging stynax in SQL Server 2012 (OFFSET n ROWS FETCH NEXT m ROWS ONLY) - Stack Overflow](https://i.stack.imgur.com/aECvD.png)